sixth_queen ([info]sixth_queen) wrote,
@ 2006-07-25 08:47:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Here's a nice post from DailyKos to start my day:

---
"It's clear to me that as the US transitions away from a consumer society driven by purchase of gadgets and toys, to a penurious lumpen society of largely underpaid and underemployed, the PTB have planned to milk the last drops by preying on the basic human needs for water, food and shelter. While it may be possible for some to forego oil-based transportation, we are dependent on electricity. The repeal of PUHCA last year was an advertisement, along with revelations of the ENRON complicity in the California blackouts, that the plan is to extort every possible cent from the populace's dependence on electricity. The people of Baltimore are already experiencing this plan in spades. This is parallel to the extortion of our healthcare dollars and gas money. The PTB know that they are impoverishing us, and that we will not be able to purchase the imported manufactured products that enrich them. No problem. They manufactured a housing bubble, and passed a new bankruptcy bill that will assure them of our monthly payments until we die. There are plans to privatize aquifers and force homeowners in rural areas to cap their wells and buy metered water. The USDA does the bidding of corporate agribusiness to put family farms out of business, forcing us all to eat corporate food. We are viewed by the PTB as 'fodder units' and our existence will soon resemble that of battery chickens.

I have no doubt that the breakdown of the electrical grid marks the beginning of the end of petroleum-based civilization. And it wouldn't surprise me to learn that rural areas will find themselves permanently without electricity as decisions are made to only maintain the grid where the largest profits can be made.

by Halcyon on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 05:11:03 AM PDT"
---


Oh bloody hell -- that's what this world is turning into. Between the recent crap in the ME and global warming, I mean that literally.



(Post a new comment)


[info]cionaudha
2006-07-25 01:20 pm UTC (link)
Welcome to the Industrial Revolution. :-/

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sixth_queen
2006-07-25 04:03 pm UTC (link)
Taken beyond what humans can endure. If only we could eliminate those pesky humans and their weaknesses, I bet businesses would make lots of profit!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]suspect_terrain
2006-07-25 02:37 pm UTC (link)
Ha. Well, the rural areas have got the coal and the natural gas. Not the rights to it, though. But we've got guns. And we (broadly speaking) elected those idiots. Too bad the Democrats are too busy feeling superior to the stupid rednecks to actually show up and run for office in rural areas.

To be a bit more serious... liberal conspiracy theories can breed in a place like DailyKos, where the like-minded feed off each other's ideas.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sixth_queen
2006-07-25 03:51 pm UTC (link)
Here's something else I just read it on Kos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/7/25/74547/8815 It's not substantiated but I believe it, conspiracy theory or no.

"I am an expert in power systems. I was a distribution system consultant for many years specializing in outage management...My time in the business bridged the final Clinton years and the first three years under Bush. Under Clinton, FEMA provided matching funds for non-profit utilities (co-ops, RECs) to convert overhead line to underground. These conversions helped to mitigate disaster related outages. The decrease in outaged freed crews to spend more time upgrading outdated components. That all changed within 2 months of Bush taking office. FEMA took the grants off the table. Government incentives were all shifted to encouraging coal fired generation plants." -- clonecone

You were right.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]suspect_terrain
2006-07-25 04:56 pm UTC (link)
Well, yeah, that I believe. The Bush administration is definitely doing everything it can to help the people in the fossil fuels businesses (oil, gas, coal). It's particularly obvious out here, where there are lots of Federal lands being opened to various sorts of exploration, archeology or environment or even ranchers be damned.

I'm not going to pretend that the Bush administration isn't a bunch of slimeballs who are totally mismanaging this whole energy thing. They could have started a "Manhattan Project" for alternative energy back the first time electricity prices went crazy in California. They didn't; they used the news as an excuse to help their buddies in the energy industry.

It would be very, very hard to privatize aquifers, though, because it would be hard to find every well and cap it. Of course, they can do it indirectly, through unchecked development that drains the aquifers dry by watering damn golf courses in the desert...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]sixth_queen
2006-07-25 08:59 pm UTC (link)
Reagan could have done it in 1980, and we would not have needed a Manhattan project at all. Or better yet, if he had only just NOT stopped what had already been started under Jimmy Carter...sigh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]golden_berry
2006-07-25 03:47 pm UTC (link)
The privatization of America has already reached ridiculous levels. In my neck of the woods, the Indiana Toll Road is now under control of a private corporation. Our IL governor is considering selling the state lottery. Wars are being fought by mercenaries such as Blackwater, while Halliburton cleans up by selling services to soldiers that the armed forces used to provide. Prisons, schools, utilities, etc etc...where will it end? It seems we as a nation are not just going back to the days of the robber barons, but all the way back to the pioneer/frontier era.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sixth_queen
2006-07-25 04:02 pm UTC (link)
Not to mention Rick Santorum wanting to privatize the National Weather Service. Oh, and I read that Halliburton does the chores so that the soldiers could spend less time scrubbing toilets and more time in combat. It's taking a toll on soldiers.

It's not so much privatization as it is over-specialization and outsourcing (not just overseas). I see advertisements for companies that do nothing but cut paychecks for other companies because it's more cost-effective than companies doing their own HR. I even saw a commercial for some company that set up offices and staff, like temping on steroids. If a company needs some help, they could rent out this office and staff. I'm not even sure I heard it right, that's how ridiculous it sounded. No wonder people are disgruntled at work.

I'm on a doom and gloom stint today, but if you want to cheer up a little, check out this weeks' issue of Fortune Magazine, the article about Jack Welch.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…